Jodi Kantor’s NY Times article here.
“Mrs. Clinton’s all-but-certain defeat brings with it a reckoning about what her run represents for women: a historic if incomplete triumph or a depressing reminder of why few pursue high office in the first place.”
Sounds like a false choice to me…how about the reality that too few Americans will let gender be the primary factor when they vote?
Clearly Hillary will do what’s best for her party….
—————————————————–
In other news…at the Boston Globe…one study suggests that:
“…men and women who enjoyed the explicit manipulation of tools or machines were more likely to choose IT careers – and it was mostly men who scored high in this area.”
also…
“The survey data showed a notable disparity on one point: That men, relative to women, prefer to work with inorganic materials; women, in general, prefer to work with organic or living things.”
Of course this is one study, which deals with averages…
Might the gender equality feminists finally have to admit that there are differences between the sexes?
Of course they’ll claim women’s freedom of choice would not be possible without them. Like a deposed dictator, I’m guessing they won’t go quietly….
See Also: Lisa Randall On Charlie Rose: Warped Passages, Are Female Students More Docile?
Addition: A good question might be how to achieve freedom of choice for women without the ideologues and extreme wings of feminism?
It may not be possible.
Addition: Maybe it is possible: A Few Thoughts: Where Is Feminism Headed?
chr1